A new global climate deal expected to be agreed in Paris at the end
of this year will not be ambitious enough to prevent dangerous
temperature rises, energy secretary Ed Davey has warned.
Mr Davey, who admitted it was “quite likely” he would no longer be
energy and climate change secretary by the UN climate talks in December,
said a legally-binding treaty can be agreed at the negotiations - and
would be the best way to curb global warming.
But he said he feared the talks in Paris would not secure commitments
to cut emissions that would keep temperatures from rising by more than
2C, a limit which countries have agreed in a bid to prevent “dangerous” climate change.
He told MPs on the parliamentary Energy and Climate Change Committee
that the UK government would be seeking a legally-binding agreement from
the talks.
Davey added: “I think that would give the greatest boost both to
confidence that we can tackle climate change and also to investors and
industry and entrepreneurs to develop the technology that will be needed
as we tackle this challenge.
“I want a comprehensive legally-binding treaty where it wouldn’t just
be the rules of the game, the accounting, monitoring, verification, all
that, which are absolutely essential to be legally binding, I would
like to see the commitments to be legally binding.”
Davey admitted that would be difficult for countries such as the US,
which would have to get legislation through both houses of Congress, and
for China, which could see it as a challenge to its sovereignty.
But he said: “I think we need to argue for it because it would be best.”
He added that a legal deal would provide the most cost-effective way to tackle the problem.
Google+
Countries are expected to put forward their proposed commitments in
the first part of the year for the measures they are going to take to
tackle climate change.
Davey said analysis of all the commitments would show they would
cumulatively “fall well short” of the action needed to keep global
temperatures from rising by more than 2C above pre-industrial levels.
He told the committee: “The objective of Paris is to keep the 2C limit within reach.
“I’m not expecting, I regret, the commitments we will see in the Paris agreement will get us to 2C, unfortunately.
“I want to be as close as possible, because increasingly my view is
we will get an agreement in Paris, but my fear is it will not be
ambitious enough and raising ambition levels is really what the climate
diplomacy and climate politics of 2015 is all about.”
Countries have previously agreed the target
to keep global temperatures from rising more than 2C above
pre-industrial levels in a bid to prevent the worst impacts of droughts,
heatwaves, floods, rising sea levels and threats to food production,
health and security.
Source: http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jan/07/paris-climate-deal-dangerous-warming-uk-energy-secretary
Top 10 Articles
-
Climate connections #climatechangeactiongroup #savetheplanet , #mitigateclimatechange via http://ift.tt/1CHVcWg
-
Another month , another renewable energy record for Scotland . Scottish wind turbines, propelled by Hurricane Ophelia 's stro...
-
By Wenching Yan ( yuumei.deviantart... ) [click on this image to find a short clip and analysis of the human cause of global warming] via h...
-
When does a social attitude become morally unacceptable enough that it is OK to challenge and confront it? That is the question tha...
-
Despite ongoing national crises such as the Grenfell fire — and the fact that Brexit talks are due to begin this week — Theresa M...
-
The fight against global warming is one of humanity’s great moral movements, alongside the abolition of slavery, the defeat of aparthe...
-
Exposure to air pollution is known to cause a vast array of respiratory health problems, but in a new study, researchers at C...
-
Reduce Your Carbon Footprint From Air Travel General. Until petroleum-based aviation fuel is replaced, you should avoid flying...
-
Will taxing meat products based on their carbon footprint reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and improve public health? The answer is ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment